A critical premise of epidemiology is that disease and other health events do not occur randomly in a population, but are more likely to occur in some members of the population than others because of risk factors that may not be distributed randomly in the population. One important use of epidemiology is to identify the factors (i.e., risk factors) that place some members of the population at greater risk of acquiring an infection than others in the same community.
CLICK HERE TO BUY MICROBIOLOGY TEXTBOOKS
A number of models of disease causation have been proposed. Among the simplest of these is the epidemiologic triad or triangle – which is the traditional model for infectious disease. The triad consists of an external agent, a susceptible host, and an environment that brings the host and agent together. It is the environment that brings the host and the infectious disease agent together. Without the environment, there will be no infection or disease in the first place. In other words, if a susceptible host stays away from environments (or activities) that may cause or lead to an infection or disease, there will be no way that the host can become sick from an infectious disease agent (or pathogen) that it is yet to come in direct (or indirect) contact with. In this model (i.e., the epidemiologic triad or triangle), infection or disease results from the interaction between the agent and the susceptible host in an environment that supports transmission of the agent from a source to that host. Two ways of depicting this model are shown in Figure 1.
Agent, host, and environmental factors interrelate in a variety of complex ways to produce disease. Different diseases require different balances and interactions of these three components. Development of appropriate, practical, and effective public health measures to control or prevent disease usually requires assessment of all three components and their interactions. Otherwise no meaningful control or prevention of the spread of the disease or infection will be achieved. It is very important for epidemiologists and medical experts to take into cognizance the significance of the epidemiologic triad whenever an intervention is being proposed to curtail the spread of an infection or disease in a defined human population.
AGENT is originally referred to an infectious microorganism or pathogen, and they include a virus, bacterium, fungi, parasite, or other microbes such as prions. Agent here refers to the infectious disease agent or pathogen that is responsible for the infection or disease in a defined human or animal population. Generally, the agent must be present for disease to occur; however, presence of that agent alone is not always sufficient to cause disease. A variety of factors influence whether exposure to an organism will result in disease, including the organism’s pathogenicity (i.e., its ability to cause disease) or virulence and the dose or dosage of the agent that entered the susceptible human or animal host. If the agent is not pathogenic or virulent enough, the establishment of an infection or disease will not be possible; and if the dosage of pathogens that entered the host is still not sufficient enough to spark an infection or disease process, there will still be no disease establishment.
Over time, the concept of agent has been broadened to include chemical and physical causes of disease or injury. These include chemical contaminants (such as the L-tryptophan contaminant responsible for eosinophilia-myalgia syndrome), as well as physical forces (such as repetitive mechanical forces associated with carpal tunnel syndrome). While the epidemiologic triad serves as a useful model for many diseases, it has proven inadequate for cardiovascular disease, cancer, and other non-infectious diseases (i.e., diseases or infections that cannot spread from one individual to another) that appear to have multiple contributing causes without a single necessary one.
HOST refers to the human who can get the disease. It can also refer to an animal or plant. A variety of factors intrinsic to the host, sometimes called risk factors, can influence an individual’s exposure, susceptibility, or response to a causative agent. Opportunities for exposure are often influenced by behaviors such as sexual practices, hygiene, and other personal choices and habits (e.g., smoking and drinking) as well as by age and sex. Susceptibility and response to an agent are influenced by factors such as genetic composition, nutritional and immunologic status, anatomic structure, presence of disease or medications, and psychological makeup.
ENVIRONMENT refers to extrinsic factors that affect the agent and the opportunity for exposure. Environmental factors include physical factors such as geology and climate, biologic factors such as insects that transmit the agent (e.g., female anopheles mosquitoes that transmits malaria parasite in tropical countries), and socioeconomic factors such as crowding or overcrowding, sanitation, and the availability of health services.
Component causes and causal pies
Because the agent-host-environment model did not work well for many non-infectious diseases, several other models that attempt to account for the multifactorial nature of causation have been proposed. One such model was proposed by Rothman in 1976, and has come to be known as the Causal Pies. This model is illustrated in Figure 2. An individual factor that contributes to cause disease is shown as a piece of a pie. After all the pieces of a pie fall into place, the pie is complete — and disease occurs. The individual factors are called component causes. The complete pie, which might be considered a causal pathway, is called a sufficient cause. A disease may have more than one sufficient cause, with each sufficient cause being composed of several component causes that may or may not overlap.
A component that appears in every pie or pathway is called a necessary cause, because without it, disease does not occur. Note in Figure 2 that component cause A is a necessary cause because it appears in every pie. The component causes may include intrinsic host factors as well as the agent and the environmental factors of the agent-host-environment triad. A single component cause is rarely a sufficient cause by itself. For example, even exposure to a highly infectious agent such as measles virus does not invariably result in measles disease. Host susceptibility and other host factors also may play a role.
At the other extreme, an agent that is usually harmless in healthy persons may cause devastating disease under different conditions. Pneumocystis carinii is an organism that harmlessly colonizes the respiratory tract of some healthy persons, but can cause potentially lethal pneumonia in persons whose immune systems have been weakened by human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Presence of Pneumocystis carinii organisms is therefore a necessary but not sufficient cause of pneumocystis pneumonia. In Figure 2., it would be represented by component cause A.
As the model indicates, a particular disease may result from a variety of different sufficient causes or pathways. For example, lung cancer may result from a sufficient cause that includes smoking as a component cause. Smoking is not a sufficient cause by itself, however, because not all smokers develop lung cancer. Neither is smoking a necessary cause, because a small fraction of lung cancer victims have never smoked. Suppose Component Cause B is smoking and Component Cause C is asbestos. Sufficient Cause I includes both smoking (B) and asbestos (C). Sufficient Cause II includes smoking without asbestos, and Sufficient Cause III includes asbestos without smoking. But because lung cancer can develop in persons who have never been exposed to either smoking or asbestos, a proper model for lung cancer would have to show at least one more Sufficient Cause Pie that does not include either component B or component C.
Note that public health action does not depend on the identification of every component cause. Disease prevention can be accomplished by blocking any single component of a sufficient cause, at least through that pathway. For example, elimination of smoking (component B) would prevent lung cancer from sufficient causes I and II, although some lung cancer would still occur through sufficient cause III.
Center for Disease Control and Prevention https://www.cdc.gov/CSELS/DSEPD/SS1978/Lesson1/Section8.html#TXT117